On Ethics and Effectiveness #1

Chairwoman McGinnis defends her endorsement vote for Central Committee Members in 2024, citing "fiduciary reasons," despite concerns about divisiveness and its impact on non-endorsed candidates. The intertwining of Treasurer roles, held by both McGinnis’s slate running mate and District 2 Worthen’s, raises questions about motive and fairness. Read related blog post here.

How does endorsing a slate that doesn’t provide detailed financial statements demonstrate fiduciary responsibility?

District 1 Candidate and Chairwoman McGinnis and Candidate/Committee Member Jim Worthen on the unusual decision to endorse Committee Member candidates.
Previous
Previous

On Ethics and Effectiveness #2

Next
Next

Time for Action